5 Simple Statements About case laws on 493 crpc pakistan Explained

Google Scholar – a vast database of state and federal case regulation, which is searchable by keyword, phrase, or citations. Google Scholar also allows searchers to specify which level of court cases to search, from federal, to specific states.

In Dosso's case (1958), the Pakistan Supreme Court used jurist Hans Kelsen's theory that a revolution might be justified when The fundamental norm underlying a Constitution disappears in addition to a new system is set in its place.

Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this is often a free and democratic state, and once a person becomes a major he / she can marry whosoever he/she likes; Should the parents of the boy or Female will not approve of this sort of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the utmost they will do if they might cut off social relations with the son or the daughter, However they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these kinds of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Female that is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or person that's a major, the couple is neither harassed by any individual nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anybody who provides such threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation, is taken to job by instituting criminal proceedings from the police against such persons and further stern action is taken against such person(s) as provided by regulation.

We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site, or the information linked to on the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can make inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This Court could interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer within a method inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the mode of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding reached by the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. Should the summary or finding is which include no reasonable person would have ever arrived at, the Court may well interfere with the conclusion or even the finding and mold the relief to make it correct into the facts of each and every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority could be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-take pleasure in the evidence or perhaps the nature of punishment. Within the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified by the decision with the Supreme Court while in the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Read more

As being the Supreme Court is definitely the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has been attained, therefore the decision in the Supreme Court needs to get taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) on the get more info Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more

The Roes accompanied the boy to his therapy sessions. When they were explained to from the boy’s past, they asked if their children were Protected with him in their home. The therapist certain them that that they had nothing at all to fret about.

However it is made clear that police is free to choose action against any person who is indulged in criminal activities topic to legislation. However no harassment shall be caused on the petitioner, if she acts within the bonds of legislation. Police shall also make certain respect from the family drop in accordance with law and if they have reasonable ground to prevent the congnizable offence they're able to act, so far as raiding the house is concerned the police shall protected concrete evidence and acquire necessary permission from the concerned high police official/Magistrate being a issue of security in the house is concerned, which will not be public place under the Act 1977. nine. Taking into consideration the aforementioned details, the objective of filing this petition has actually been obtained. Consequently, this petition is hereby disposed of from the terms stated higher than. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 40 Order Date: 08-APR-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

Case regulation, also used interchangeably with common law, is really a law that is based on precedents, that may be the judicial decisions from previous cases, fairly than legislation based on constitutions, statutes, or regulations. Case legislation uses the detailed facts of a legal case that have been resolved by courts or similar tribunals.

Summaries offer concise explanations of legal principles and significant cases pertaining to land ownership, real estate transactions, property rights, and related matters, assisting you in understanding the intricacies of land and property legislation.

Matter:-DIRECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252210 Tag:The regulation enjoins the police to generally be scrupulously fair on the offender along with the Magistracy is to make sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court along with from other courts However they have failed to have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The a lot of this power casts an obligation on the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested to get a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.

Any court may possibly seek to distinguish the present case from that of a binding precedent, to succeed in a different conclusion. The validity of this type of distinction may or may not be accepted on appeal of that judgment to your higher court.

If that judgment goes to appeal, the appellate court will have the opportunity to review both the precedent and the case under appeal, Most likely overruling the previous case legislation by setting a new precedent of higher authority. This may perhaps transpire several times as being the case works its way through successive appeals. Lord Denning, first on the High Court of Justice, later of the Court of Appeal, provided a famous example of this evolutionary process in his advancement of the concept of estoppel starting from the High Trees case.

Rulings by courts of “lateral jurisdiction” are certainly not binding, but may be used as persuasive authority, which is to provide substance on the party’s argument, or to guide the present court.